jenniferkobernik: (Default)
[personal profile] jenniferkobernik
With energy and housing prices soaring in many places, I think now is a good time to talk about living with less stuff and less energy at home.

I’m going to tackle “stuff” first, because this may have an impact on how big of a home you need and/or how much of that home actually needs to be climate-controlled.

Most people in developed countries own too much stuff. Stuff costs money both directly (to buy and maintain it, and to buy duplicates hen you can’t find something because you have so much stuff) and indirectly (by requiring a larger home, more land or outbuildings, or a storage unit to keep it in as well as more higher energy costs to keep it at an acceptable temperature and humidity level to prevent molding, rusting, warping, or other deterioration). It also often costs money to dispose of (landfill or garbage collection ruin fees), which you can avoid by not buying it in the first place. There is also a great deal of embodied energy in stuff which might have been put to better use elsewhere, depending on the stuff!

Stuff also costs time, attention, and focus. You have to maintain it, clean it, move it around, look for it when it’s lost, worry about how messy your house/garage/desk is, berate yourself for being too fat to wear it or spending money you didn’t have on it every time you see it, and look at draining visual clutter. Bleh.

How much stuff you need and how much stuff you can maintain before diminishing returns take over depends a lot on your lifestyle. I have much more stuff now as a homesteader and regenerative rancher than I did during the years when I was living a nomadic lifestyle in my truck. Much, much more! Chances are, though, that you still have too much. So, how to get rid of it?

I must confess that I am a fan of the KonMari method developed by Marie Kondo in Japan. People love to mock the KonMari trend, but honestly I think her books are really good (haven’t watched the show), although her style isn’t for everyone. Basically, you gather and sort through all your possessions by category (not by room), touching each thing and making a decision about it, keeping only those which “spark joy” or are obviously essential. Then you store them, sometimes in particular ways. You do this in one big, marathon stretch (it might take months, but you aim to get it all done, not to do a little at a time as with “donate or throw away three things every day” sorts of methods. If you’re interested, I recommend her book The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up. For a more severe, urban type of minimalism, you might check out Fumio Dasani’s book Goodbye, Things.

Other popular approaches are setting a timer and decluttering for 15 minutes per day (as recommended by Martha Cilley, the “FLYLady”); doing a 30 day challenge in which you get rid of one thing on day one, two things on day two, and so forth for a total of 465 things in one month; putting everything you own in a particular category (say, dresses or hand tools or coffee mugs) in a box and donating anything you haven’t taken out of the box in three months; getting rid of anything that you did not know to be useful or believe to be beautiful, and many others.

You don’t have to actually become a minimalist, but reducing your possessions to the point where you know what you own, where it is, what needs to be done to or with it, and what you lack will create physical space and financial slack as well as improving your focus and reducing your stress. You’ll probably also find that you put what you do keep to better use and take better care of it. Decluttering also helps you see what physical possessions might be advantageous for you to acquire and can even help pay for them (by selling your excess via a yard sale, a consignment shop, Craigslist ads, or an eBay store, for instance). You can also dispose of unwanted items via local “buy nothing” groups and, of course, thrift stores and charity shops.

Now that you have less stuff to store and manage, let’s take a look at energy use at home.

The most impactful thing you could do in this regard is probably to downsize, if your decluttering and your life situation makes this possible. This could mean moving into a smaller house or apartment, moving into a vehicle or RV, clearing out a previously cluttered room or suite to turn into a rental, or closing off a portion of your dwelling so that it no longer requires heating or cooling (beware of creating mold problems or freezing your pipes, however!) You could also consider buying or building a home with passive solar orientation or other passive heating/cooling methods built in, but this is of course difficult for most people.

Next, consider improvements that would allow you to maintain the same level of comfort with less energy. This might include such modifications as extra insulation, an attic fan, energy-efficient windows with reflective and/or insulative covers, rugs for cold floors, weatherization and sealing, solar hot water of the “black tank on the roof” variety (not photovoltaic), installing a rocket mass heater, adding a passive solar greenhouse for heating, planting shade trees or deciduous vines on trellises, installing geothermal pipes, energy-efficient appliances, washing clothes in cold water, etc. John Michael Greer’s Green Wizardry book is a good resource here, as is permies.com, and many power companies or cooperatives and local governments offer energy audits and even discounts and grants for this sort of work. One drawback of this approach is that it can require synthetic and to some degree toxic/off-gassing materials, so be aware and look for alternatives and mitigation measures if necessary.

Next, if necessary, consider measures that may reduce comfort or convenience (although not beyond your ability to tolerate). This might include turning the thermostat up or down while adding or removing clothes, reducing the temperature of household hot water, using a clothesline or drying rack instead of a clothes dryer, making do with less light at night, reducing the size of your refrigerator, turning things completely off or unplugging them when you’re not using them, reusing clothing or towels before washing, or replacing electrical appliances with manual ones. Some of these gains are fairly significant; others are marginal at best. It’s best to have a few of these tricks up your sleeve for hard times even if you don’t practice them on a daily basis.

Finally, consider alternative sources of energy. This would, for most people in conventional houses, be a solar photovoltaic system, although in some circumstances wind or micro-hydro or on-site biogas or biomass generation might be appropriate (and preferable). Photovoltaic systems and their batteries only make sense once you have drastically reduced energy use; even then, there is a lot of toxicity and environmental destruction involved in their manufacture and the mining of materials, and they tend to be fairly expensive and need periodic maintenance and replacement. We do use some solar PV, but I think the idea of slapping up solar panels sufficient to support “normal” energy use is a terrible idea even if you can afford it. Reduce usage first! Also consider that grid-tied solar, while it may make you some money in some locations, will likely be shut down in the event of a power outage.

A final note: if you use energy sources such as propane/natural gas, or anything that requires a tank, consider upgrading to a larger tank and filling up when that energy source is cheap (for instance, propane is usually cheaper in summer than in winter).

That’s all for this month, folks! Happy Independence Day, for those of you celebrating, and may we all become a little more independent of the unsustainable systems surrounding us in the next year! See you August 4th!

(On a personal note, the baby and our little family continue to do well, and any prayers, blessings, and well-wishes sent our way continue to be appreciated!)

Date: 2022-07-05 08:40 pm (UTC)
open_space: (Default)
From: [personal profile] open_space
Hi Jen,
I haven't been able to follow these --I should remedy that soon-- nonetheless I wanted to thank you for them.

Are you okay with me praying for your baby to Our Lady of Guadalupe?

Best wishes!

Thanks Jen!

Date: 2022-07-07 12:05 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Thanks as always for the well thought out, entertaining, and informative post. Decades ago, I knew someone who firmly believed that we form literal energy attachments to our stuff, whether or not we remember it's in our space. Honestly, I think he was right! Over the years, husband and I have done a periodic "turf out" a la KonMari. Last year we decided that the ginormous treadmill which served us well for a few years needed to go. We'll just bundle up in winter and go for a walk, for heavens sake. The flat environment of the treadmill was working merry heck with our knees and feet. The local sporting goods shop where we bought it doubles as a resale shop for such stuff, and they were happy to come and get it and give us a check for $100 to boot. You know what? After that critter left our house, the place literally, honest to gosh, felt lighter! It was pretty amazing. We'd walk into the room where it once was, and just say "Wow!" This continued for several days, the change was that big.

It's good to know you, baby, and hubby are doing well! Blessings continue on you all.

Your child is so very lucky to have such a loving family.

Best to you and yours,

Valerie

Solar Panels

Date: 2022-07-12 12:17 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hey Jen,

I visited Jim Kunstler's blog this morning (July 11, 2022) where he gives a painful account of his solar power woes entitled "It's Not Working."

After talking with our HVAC guy several months ago about pros and cons, it was pretty much all con and no pro. We live in SW Idaho, so plenty of sun, but relatively cheap (for now) power. Why spend all of that money? He made the point that the system is expensive to install, you are NOT off the grid, after 10 - 20 years you need to replace your system, never mind repair what breaks in the meantime, and good luck having work done on your roof with all of that sitting there. His take was for this region, anyway, solar is for geeks and the fashion conscious.

FWIW...

Valerie

Re: Solar Panels

Date: 2022-08-12 07:38 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I too am a big fan of full freezers and their money saving ways, and also worry about extended power outages ruining that investment by thawing everything in them (especially here in CA, where they are turning off the power to prevent wildfires more and more often, and when everyone is out of power it can be hard to even get dry ice to tide you over for a while). I looked around for various solutions, and unless I give up freezing, which I'm just not ready to yet, the best option I could find was DC freezers, directly powered from batteries and/or solar/wind/hydro without the need for an inverter. I got one from SunDanzer that claims to not even need batteries, it just uses the thermal flywheel of a well-insulated mass of deep-frozen solids to hold cold temperatures over a few days of no sun (since in my case it's directly powered by photovoltaics). It's a model they don't make anymore, but I asked and they re-configured one of their newer models to run that way for me (they call it Direct Drive). Haven't had enough cloudy days to really put it to the test yet (a CA summer is nothing if not constantly sunny), but since it's 12 volt anyway I can hook it up to batteries if needed and still have power. Not cheap though, I think mine was $1200 plus shipping, but I'll pay that to keep a freezer going when nobody else has power! Just thought you and others might be intersted.

DutyBound

Re: Solar Panels

Date: 2022-08-12 09:38 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
That sounds like a really nice setup! Thank you!

Date: 2022-07-09 12:31 pm (UTC)
drhooves: (Default)
From: [personal profile] drhooves
Hi Jen, you've knocked another one out of the park as they say, with this very timely post on two legs of the LESS stool. I was 18 when I went out of state to college 42 years ago, and had moved with my family just five times through 1980. Since then, it's been another 28 moves across 11 states, with another on deck next month, this time 1000 miles from Illinois to North Dakota. My career started out in the military, and then I went into IT, so putting down roots was difficult. I've cycled through several iterations of having too much stuff, and am trying to reduce the extra junk I've collected after buying houses twice in the last 16 years. Like the owners manual I have for my 1992 EX-500.

It's not always easy, and one of my hobbies (motorcycles) complicates things. But I have an older brother who is a hoarder/collector of junk, and he's far worse than me. He still hasn't cleaned out and sold his old house after moving into a bigger place nine years ago! There's certainly a lot of mental fortitude necessary to give up the impractical material things that beckon, but the reward is well worth it. And with the future getting more volatile, flexibility is now key.

Using less energy and "right-sizing" the abode can be a lot more challenging. I've been rather shocked at how housing prices and rentals have sky-rocketed all across the country. It's just madness. And even new construction is still dependent on a dated approach to low cost gas and electricity, which is going away and not coming back. You've got some excellent ideas on things to possibly implement to save on energy costs, and the sooner those our reviewed for each individual situation, the better. A common approach has been to sell a home, and look for something new that's closer to the requirements needed, but I think a better choice can be just modify/improve/upgrade in place. Restarting the amortization on the mortgage is pretty costly.

I hope you have continued good luck with the new baby and the building up of your local "community". I'm hoping to be able to make some progress along the community front with like-minded folks up north, as most of them are from farming families. Unfortunately, I think the vast majority of the urban and suburban types are not well prepared for the changes we've seen over the last few years, and for what's ahead....

Date: 2022-07-21 09:07 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Good luck to you and your family!

How do you plan to deal with all the modern Official Rules for child safety? They make parenting harder than it used to be and there's the threat of being reported if you break them.

We carefully researched temperatures and tog ratings so that our winter baby stayed safe with our house at 60F. But also we pretty much stopped turning it down to 55 at night--with a newborn who was up at all hours, adjusting for that temp change was too difficult. So our oil bill went up.

Occasionally we'd get some official person (such as the lactation consultant; BTW I never produced much milk so yeah there was that too) complaining about how bundled the baby was and we'd have to be all "We have an old drafty house, this outfit is appropriate for home." (But the "no warm bedclothes if you're sleep-deprived and the baby's with you" Sleep Safety Rule plus our house temp did mean the lactation consultant's "skin to skin might help you lactate!" never got followed.)

Now it's summer and it's Officially even Riskier to let the house stay hot (after all, "Cold babies cry, hot babies die!") and/or open the windows on Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups air days.

(And TBH we do notice those days, officially labeled or not. We started noticing them in the teens, when I was on the borderline of being diagnosed with asthma. Then we had (probably) covid and now we both have shortness of breath outside on those days. We even notice increased difficulty breathing on "Fair/Sensitive Groups May Experience Damage Over The Long Term/You Can Bring The Baby Outside But Take Precautions" days. And there are more and more such days.)

So we put a portable AC that has a thermostat in the baby's room. When the house gets above 85 or so we turn it on set to 78 to 80. Baby sleeps much better when it's on (vs. when it's say 83 and we just have a fan blowing. BTW in hot countries fan use is associated with a decreased risk of SIDS/SUID). But of course AC is very expensive to run.

Meanwhile the Official Recommendations on safe sleep are something like "keep baby's sleep area at 78 or below at all times"...

What temp do you keep your home? Are you planning to follow Safe Sleep 7 or put the baby in an Officially Safe Sleep Space(tm) or what?

-Ochre Shabby Sea Serpent

temperature for babies.

Date: 2022-07-26 02:41 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Those recommendations sound crazy. Human babies have been living at all temperatures with their families all over the world since...humans. I have 3 children. I do not heat the house at night. You can make a wool sleep sack for a baby if you are worried about blankets. I swaddled mine in blankets to put to bed. It never gets below 45'F in the house overnight, usual warmer than that, in the low 50's. Summers are warmer. I have never lived in a house with airconditioning. When my eldest was born, it was a heat wave week, high temperatures for that area of Ca. Baby slept better than me. In this house, where it gets hotter, we made the changes to the house to keep it cooler, and had the baby sleep downstairs bedroom with us ( upstairs is alot hotter. That north bedroom did not go above 85'F or 95'F in a heat wave. When I put a baby in bed with us, I had a down comforter. That is a good way for alot of warmth without weight or lots of layers to tangle.

Re: temperature for babies.

Date: 2022-07-26 10:17 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It's because of today's extreme focus on SIDS/SUID.

They don't want the baby to smother on a hat (so "keep the room warm enough the baby doesn't need a hat") or bedclothes (so "no bedclothes" or the British "feet to foot of the crib, only a knit or crocheted blanket, no higher than shoulders, and tuck it in tight") or get overheated (which has been associated with SIDS / sudden infant deaths for centuries), whether from being overbundled in the cold (so "dress in this many tog of clothing for this temperature" guides) or just from summer heat (so "keep it at 78F or below").

(Of course SIDS rates dropped during lockdowns...possibly due to fewer/slower vaccinations...but you probably can't successfully argue that if someone reports you for not following SIDS guidelines.)

IMO the British guidelines are more practical than the American ones: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/baby/caring-for-a-newborn/reduce-the-risk-of-sudden-infant-death-syndrome/ But they recommend cooler temps (61-68F as "ideal")...because they can, it's usually cool there. Not recently, I know!

The Australians are also more practical on SIDS IMO and here's what they say about temperature: https://rednose.org.au/article/room-temperature

They mention the fan thing.

>I swaddled mine in blankets to put to bed.

You've reminded me that at the very beginning we adjusted between 55 and 60 by adding or removing a swaddle blanket (an extra warm one my friend had crocheted from weight 3 yarn). But she managed to break out and roll over very early, and after that it's Officially Unsafe to continue swaddling (since if they break out the loose blanket could block their air, or if they roll they could get into a position that blocked their air and the restriction of the swaddle could prevent them from getting into a better position).

-Ochre Shabby Sea Serpent

Profile

jenniferkobernik: (Default)
Jen

October 2024

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
202122 23242526
2728293031  

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 02:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »